Library Open Repository
Pragmatist and neo-classical policy paradigms in public services: which is the better template for program design?
Marsh, I and Spies-Butcher, B (2009) Pragmatist and neo-classical policy paradigms in public services: which is the better template for program design? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68 (3). pp. 239-255. ISSN 0313-6647
Pragmatist_and_...pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.
Principal-agent theory alerts principals to their problematic relationship with agents. The former are encouraged to take deliberate action to counter asymmetries in knowledge, moral hazard etc. To avoid this, principals should determine outcomes and contracts and incentives should be designed to achieve them. This approach has influenced the form of purchaser-provider arrangements, including the Job Network. This article reviews impacts, which include incentives for gaming and increased transaction costs. Another survey highlighted the extent to which innovation in the disability employment sector had depended on collaboration, which competition would end. The article then sketches an alternative pragmatic or experimental approach, which assumes that the centre can never establish outcomes that are other than provisional and corrigible. Program design needs to be built around this fundamental fact. Learning not ‘carrots and sticks’ is the appropriate form of relationship. The article explores the feasibility of this approach in a Job Network context.
|Keywords:||innovation;public policy;human services|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Australian Journal of Public Administration|
|Page Range:||pp. 239-255|
|Identification Number - DOI:||10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00637.x|
The original publication is available at
|Date Deposited:||20 Aug 2010 06:50|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2014 04:12|
|Item Statistics:||View statistics for this item|
Actions (login required)
|Item Control Page|