Evaluating the use of a portable ultrasound machine to quantify intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilation: agreement between measurements from two ultrasound machines.
Magnussen, CG and Fryer, JL and Venn, AJ and Laakkonen, M and Raitakari, OT (2006) Evaluating the use of a portable ultrasound machine to quantify intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilation: agreement between measurements from two ultrasound machines. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 32 (9). p. 1329. ISSN 0301-5629
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16965972&query_hl=3&itool=pubmed_docsum
Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) are intermediate endpoints for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a portable ultrasound machine was capable of valid measurements of FMD and CIMT compared with a clinic-based machine under similar conditions. Vascular images were taken on 23 apparently healthy young adults with the portable type and clinic type instruments. The analyses revealed a high level of agreement between the two machines for measurements of maximum CIMT (mean difference [MD] = -0.025 mm, limits of agreement [LOA] = -0.080, 0.029 mm), mean CIMT (MD = 0.001 mm, LOA = -0.065, 0.065 mm) and FMD measures of brachial diameter (baseline MD = 0.199 mm, LOA = -0.210, 0.608 mm, maximum MD = 0.218 mm, LOA = -0.162, 0.597 mm). Reasonable agreement was found for %FMD measurements (MD = 0.27%, LOA = -4.91, 5.44%). The within-machine coefficient of variation results for maximum CIMT (5.0%), mean CIMT (4.3%), baseline (6.3%) and maximum (5.4%) brachial diameter and %FMD (30.1%) were comparable with normal within-subject variation. We conclude that the portable ultrasound machine can provide measurements of FMD and CIMT that are highly comparable with measurements obtained from a clinic-based machine under similar clinical conditions.
|Keywords:||Ultrasonography, Cardiovascular disease, Diognostic Imaging, Diagnostics|
|Deposited By:||INVALID USER|
|Deposited On:||01 Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||01 Feb 2013 15:14|
|ePrint Statistics:||View statistics for this ePrint|
Repository Staff Only: item control page