Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Facies architecture, geochemistry and tectonic signifigance of the ural volcanic and the Mount Hope volcanics, Central Lachlan Orogen,NSW


Downloads per month over past year

Bull, KF (2006) Facies architecture, geochemistry and tectonic signifigance of the ural volcanic and the Mount Hope volcanics, Central Lachlan Orogen,NSW. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img] PDF (Front matter)
Bull_front.pdf | Download (943kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

[img] PDF (Ch. 1-5)
bull-ch1-5.pdf | Document not available for request/download
Full text restricted until 2116.
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

[img] PDF (Ch. 6 - appendix)
bull-ch6-app.pdf | Document not available for request/download
Full text restricted until 2116.
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.


This study focuses on facies analysis, geochemistry, geochronology and tectonic significance
of the Ural Volcanics (UV) and Mount Hope Volcanics (MEV) in the Central Lachlan Orogen
in New South Wales. The UV and MHV overlie non-volcanic sedimentary, below wave base,
submarine facies within two intracontinental rift basins, the Rast and Mount Hope Troughs.
The UV and MHV consist primarily of felsic, coherent facies and associated felsic monomictic
breccia facies. These volcanic facies are interpreted to represent submarine lava-sill complexes,
which define intrabasinal, effusive, volcanic and shallow intrusive centres. The lTV include at
least 35 separate lava or sill emplacement units that amount to ~10 km3
In the MHY, at least 18
lavas and sills are present, and have thicknesses up to ~120 m. The combined volume of the two
largest MHV units is estimated to be <1.5 km3
In the Uv, siltstone-matrix monomictic breccia facies is characterised by continuously laminated
siltstone matrix between monomictic, non-vesicular, felsic clasts. This facies is interpreted to
form from water-settled sediment deposited between lava clasts, and must therefore occur on the
upper margin of a lava. The presence of conformable, continuous laminae helps to distinguish
this facies from peperite. Hence, correct identification of the siltstone-matrix monomictic breccia
facies is critical in distinguishing lavas from sills.
The autoclastic facies in the UV and MHV account for up to 10% of single emplacement
units. In most cases, the clasts have blocky or slab by shapes and are flow-banded, implying
that auto brecciation was the main fragmentation mechanism. Neither in situ or resedimented
hyaloclstite are recognised in the UV or MHY, in contrast to other submarine felsic lavas and
domes elsewhere.
Pumice-rich volcaniclastic facies in the UV and MHV are less voluminous than the coherent
and monomictic breccia facies. The UV pumice-rich facies are interpreted to represent felsic
pyroclastic facies erupted in a single, open-vent explosive eruption from a local vent and
transported in, and deposited from, submarine gravity currents (pumice-rich facies association),
and settled from suspension in the water column (fiamme-siltstone breccia facies). Similar syneruptive
pyroclastic facies occur in the MHv, but their source has not been identified.
Fiamme-bearing facies occur in both the UV and MHv, in fiamme-bearing pyroclastic facies and
as pseudoclastic textures. Fiamme textures can also be formed in a variety of other ways. The
common genetic use of the term fiamme for textures produced by welding compaction is easily
misinterpreted. 'Fiamme' would be better used descriptively to mean elongate lenses or domains
of the same mineralogy, texture or composition, which define a pre-tectonic foliation, and are
separated by domains of different mineralogy, texture or composition.
Results from LA-ICPMS U/Pb dating of zircons indicate that the UV and the MHV were
roughly coeval and erupted in the Late Silurian-Early Devonian, within the time period ~420-
410 Ma. Both successions consist of dacites and rhyolites and have A-type to transitional I-type
geochemical affinities. High-level, felsic, A-type plutons with myrmekitic and/ or granophyric
texture occur in both study areas. Geochemistry suggests they are comagmatic with the volcanic
facies. Cross-cutting mafic to intermediate dykes and small intrusions are not co magmatic with
the felsic coherent facies.
A modern analogue for the UV and lvlHV felsic has not been recognised. The closest analogue
is the Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB). Parts of the IPB contain
similar felsic coherent, monomictic breccia facies, and syn-eruptive pyroclastic facies as the UV
and MHV The IPB volcanic rocks are also A-type in composition. The numerous similarities of
the IPB to the UV and MHV suggest the Australian successions have great potential for hosting
volcanic-hosted massive sulfide (VI-IMS) deposits, however, neither previous exploration nor
mapping during this study have uncovered any VHMS-related altered zones or prospects.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Additional Information:

Copyright 2006 the Author

Date Deposited: 11 Aug 2011 23:39
Last Modified: 11 Mar 2016 05:54
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page