Library Open Repository
Education debate: clinical diagnostic reasoning
Boyd, GW (2011) Education debate: clinical diagnostic reasoning. Internal Medicine Journal, 41 (7). pp. 573-576. ISSN 1444-0903
Education_Debat...pdf | Download (200kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.
Whilst it is clear that experienced clinicians adopt a rational approach of diagnosis, the logic of their clinical reasoning has been difficult to define. I outline here an approach based on the four categories of a complete diagnosis: Anatomical diagnosis (system involved); Pathological diagnosis (nature of the condition); Physiological diagnosis (functional consequences) and Aetiological diagnosis (background cause). Each phrase of the history and examination data is assigned to one or other of these categories as the case unfolds, with interpretations and interactions allowing sub-conclusions that gradually build to a final clinical diagnosis overall. The system has the advantage of facilitating a diagnosis individualized to the patient, rather than to some previously learned diagnostic ‘checklist’. As such, it should provide an advance over current problem-based approaches to clinical diagnosis.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Internal Medicine Journal|
|Publisher:||University of Tasmania Library Special and Rare Materials Collection|
|Page Range:||pp. 573-576|
|Identification Number - DOI:||10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02529.x|
|Additional Information:||The definitive published version is available online at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/ NJ 3/12/12 See: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/imj_elf.pdf for licence information. Accepted version may be made open, but published version may not.|
|Date Deposited:||08 Feb 2012 04:39|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2016 04:20|
|Item Statistics:||View statistics for this item|
Actions (login required)
|Item Control Page|