Library Open Repository

Insights into "mysterious processes": Incentivising co-innovation in agrifood value chains

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Bonney, LB (2012) Insights into "mysterious processes": Incentivising co-innovation in agrifood value chains. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Front matter)
front-bonney-th...pdf | Download (405kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Whole thesis)
whole-bonney-th...pdf | Download (8MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

The globalisation of agrifood markets and the liberalisation of world trade is creating a new
competitive environment. Price-based competition is giving way to innovation-based competition and
businesses are increasingly turning to collaborative innovation or ‘co-innovation’ to be able to
compete. As a result, the locus of competition has shifted from the individual firm to competition
between whole chains. Thus, the core concerns for modern businesses are managing collaboration and
innovation across whole value chains (vertical co-innovation) to create competitive advantage. The
Australian agrifood industry has been slow to adopt co- innovation and investment lags behind other
industries. Although the industry faces unique challenges compared to other industries, little research
has been done on the dynamics of co-innovation in agrifood chains or the strategic issue of how firms,
executives and employees are incentivised to co-innovate.
Therefore, this thesis addresses the problem of how to incentivise firms, executives and individual
employees to co-innovate in agrifood value chains. Because this involves a multi-disciplinary
investigation of multi-level systems with complex, interacting variables and the lack of crossdisciplinary
research in this field, an exploratory research design based on the constructivistinterpretivist
paradigm using a phenomenological strategy of inquiry was adopted. A case study
research method was employed to gather data from three purposively selected, contrasting agrifood
value chains in Australia and North America using 128 semi-structured interviews with managers and
a range of company and public documents. Qualitative content analysis was then undertaken using
NVivo 8 computer software.
The investigation found that the mental models held by executives of the most powerful firm, usually
the retailer or the processor, determine the form of chain governance and consequently the incentives
employed to achieve the chain goals. Achieving those goals requires complex behaviours at firm,
executive and employee levels in a dynamic environment and so multiple forms of incentives need to
be employed and managed purposefully to motivate such behaviour. Incentives need to be aligned
with strategy and have a degree of individualisation. They should also be supported by appropriate
chain values, culture and other management functions such as chain partner selection, recruitment and
professional development. Firm incentivation strategies need to incorporate economic, normative and
social incentives. Although aligned with overall chain strategy, these will be different at each level of
the chain, Tier 1, Tier 2 and Input Suppliers, reflecting their different contributions to creating
consumer value, their differential capacities and idiosyncratic aims. Individual incentivation to coinnovate
should incorporate extrinsic, social and intrinsic incentives and take place in a supportive
culture if behavioural intentions are to achieve co-innovative outcomes.
The analysis also provided support for the conceptualisation of four conditions that influence coinnovation:
relational competence, cultural compatibility, a co-innovation architecture and coinnovation
competence. The presence of these conditions was associated with the development of coinnovation
and their absence with the inhibition of co-innovation.
The contribution of this study is its systemic, multi-level model of chain incentivation through the
integration of concepts from the value chain, incentivation, collaboration and agrifood literature. This
highlights possible future research in agrifood value chain incentivation and suggests that managers in
value chains should adopt multi-level strategies with multiple forms of incentives to achieve coinnovation.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: agrifood value chain, incentivation, co-innovation, multi-level model, systems
Additional Information:

Copyright the Author

Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2012 04:53
Last Modified: 11 Mar 2016 05:53
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page