Biosecurity under uncertainty: The influence of information availability and quality on expert decision-making for risk outcomes
Dahlstrom, A (2012) Biosecurity under uncertainty: The influence of information availability and quality on expert decision-making for risk outcomes. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.
Alongside climate change and habitat loss, aquatic nonindigenous species (ANS) introductions comprise a large and increasing contribution of the anthropogenic threat to environmental,economic, sociocultural and human health values worldwide. Biosecurity agencies aim to prevent
and manage introductions using various tools, including risk assessment. Risk assessment canprioritize threats, but is frequently compromised by uncertainty, often due to informationavailability, quality and interpretation. Many risk assessment processes lack consistent and transparent treatment of uncertainty, particularly when biosecurity objectives warrant a precautionary approach.
This thesis aims to identify methods for managing uncertainty via an initial review of 14 existing
national, regional and international biosecurity instruments. Results from this review found over half
of the instruments explicitly included or mentioned precaution, and many instruments
acknowledged the potential influence of subjective risk perceptions. Based on these outcomes, this
thesis aims to: determine sources of uncertainty; understand the cognitive process of estimating
consequence, and therefore risk under uncertainty; and provide transparent methods to reduce
uncertainty that allow for precaution, using input from ANS experts in scientific and management
fields. Finally, this thesis aims to examine how the frequentist statistical focus on low acceptable
rates of Type I errors, most frequently applied in ANS impact research, influences findings of
significant impact and the implications for management decisions.
Results of this thesis indicate that the scarcity of ANS impact information constitutes a primary
source of uncertainty. When faced with knowledge gaps and other forms of uncertainty, experts
tended to assume and assign lower consequence via a ‘hindsight approach’ (assume no impact
without sufficient information), which stands opposite to precaution. To mitigate the effects of
uncertainty, experts supported the use of alternative information sources, including non-empirical
evidence. In practice, the provision of information and group discussion generally increased the
consequence estimate, thus suggesting methods that allow functional and, if desired, precautionary
consequence assessments despite high uncertainty. In situations of expected ‘low’ certainty, when
information is available, my research indicated that an extremely high proportion of statistical
analyses of impact had insufficient power to detect an impact, leading to ‘false certainty’ of no
impact. This bias toward ‘missing’ impacts, again opposite to precaution, may further prevent
appropriate management action.
The thesis concludes with a proposed framework that provides guidance for biosecurity-related
research and management using an acceptable level of risk. It provides a transparent process and
usable risk outcomes that: (1) integrate scientific process and management objectives; (2) are
accountable for and unimpeded by uncertainty; (3) consider the assumptions used by the experts
making the assessment; (4) can be adapted according to varying strengths of precaution desired by
management; (5) follows World Trade Organization Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement
mandates; and (6) are feasible given time and budget constraints.
|Item Type:||Thesis (PhD)|
|Additional Information:||Copyright the Author|
|Keywords:||risk, uncertainty, biosecurity, nonindigenous aquatic spaces|
|Deposited By:||ePrints Officer|
|Deposited On:||30 Aug 2012 17:33|
|Last Modified:||06 Jan 2014 16:51|
|ePrint Statistics:||View statistics for this ePrint|
Repository Staff Only: item control page