Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Comparison of passive and active immunisation of fish against microbial diseases with consideration of the mechanisms involved

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Akhlaghi, M (1995) Comparison of passive and active immunisation of fish against microbial diseases with consideration of the mechanisms involved. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Whole thesis)
whole_AkhlaghiM...pdf | Download (17MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

| Preview

Abstract

Passive immunisation of fish was carried out to determine whether anti-Vibrio
anguillarum antibodies (AVA), anti-Streptococcus sp. antibodies (ASA), and antiParamoeba
sp. antibodies (APA) raised in sheep, rabbits and rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) were persistent and biologically active in rainbow trout.
Results of passive immunisation were compared with results of active immunisation in
which fish were immunised by immersion in or injection with formalin-killed cells.
Assessments of passive and active immunisation were undertaken concurrently for up
to three months in order to demonstrate their relative efficacies and, especially, to
evaluate the practical potential of passive immunisation.
Sheep and rabbit antibodies were detected in fish sera by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for up to 70 days after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection.
The relative percent survival (RPS) of fish challenged with virulent V. anguillarum
after an i.p. injection (0.1 ml 100 g-1 fish body weight) of sheep, rabbit or fish AVA
was 93.3, 86.6, 40% at one month; 25, 18.7, 12.5% at two months and 13.3, 4.1, 9.0%
at three months post-immunisation (p.i.) respectively. In order to obtain equivalent
protection to undiluted fish serum, rabbit and sheep sera had to be diluted 1: 8 and 1:
50 respectively. Protection conferred by immune sera was shown to be due to the
specific antibodies alone. Also inactivation of complement from sera had no effect on
the potency of either immune or non-immune sera. Affinity purified sheep and rabbit
AVA sera were demonstrated to have equivalent protective potential as whole antisera
in rainbow trout. Fish actively immunised by immersion showed RPS of 86.6, 93, and
81.8% after one, two and three months p.i. respectively in the same trials. Fish
immune responses to sheep and rabbit antisera were determined (using specific
ELISA) with the greater response being to the rabbit serum.
Rainbow trout given sheep AVA conjugated to LTB (the GM-1-binding subunit
of Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin) orally had a RPS of 37.5% at 15 days and a RPS
of 27% after one month post-immunisation. In contrast, sheep AVA conjugated to
TraT (an internal membrane of E. coli) and Quil-A had RPSs of 18.7 and 6.2% after
fifteen days and 13.3 and 0% after one month p.i. respectively.
The relative percent survival of rainbow trout challenged with virulent
Streptococcus sp. after an i.p. injection (0.1 ml 100 g-1 fish body weight) of sheep,
rabbit or fish anti-Streptococcus sp. antibodies was 88.8, 50, 0.0% after one month ;
33.3, 6.8, 6.8% after two months and 13.3, 0, 6.6% after three months p.i. respectively.
Fish immunised actively had RPS of 88.8 and 11.1% after one month, 38.1 and 4.7%
after two months 36 and 0.0% after three months p.i. for the injection and immersion
routes respectively. Thus, passive immunisation shows potential as a therapeutic and
prophylactic against streptococcosis as it gives similar results to active intraperitoneal
vaccination and would be expected to provide immediate protection.
In one trial Atlantic salmon immunised i.p. with Paramoeba vaccines showed
marked humoral responses. In another trial, Atlantic salmon were immunised
passively with an i.p. injection (0.1 ml 100 g-1 fish body weight) of sheep APA.
Immunised fish (both actively and passively) were exposed to a natural infection (by
cohabitation with infected Atlantic salmon) one month post-immunisation.
Transmission of the disease was successful. No unequivocal protection was
demonstrated in any of the immunised fish in this experimental challenge trial.
Moreover, local antibody against Paramoeba sp. in gill mucus of experimentally
infected Atlantic salmon was not detected (by ELISA).
It is shown in this study that passive immunisation has significant potential in
disease prevention when given to fish at strategic times, especially in the face of an
outbreak when there is not enough time for an active immune response. Thus, there
should be a future for the use of mammalian hyperimmune sera against fish diseases,
in particular, those for which useful immunity by active immunisation is not available.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: Fishes, Fishes, Veterinary microbiology
Copyright Holders: The Author
Copyright Information:

Copyright 1995 the Author - The University is continuing to endeavour to trace the copyright
owner(s) and in the meantime this item has been reproduced here in good faith. We
would be pleased to hear from the copyright owner(s).

Additional Information:

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University Tasmania at Launceston, 1995. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 184-210)

Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2014 00:42
Last Modified: 23 Aug 2017 05:06
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP