Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Group resource rights and the protection of indigenous knowledge systems in international law

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Okpanum, CC (2007) Group resource rights and the protection of indigenous knowledge systems in international law. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Whole thesis)
whole_OkpanumCo...pdf | Download (24MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

| Preview

Abstract

This thesis considers the nature of indigenous knowledge systems, and recommends how the interests of indigenous and local communities could be protected in their knowledge systems. The need to protect indigenous knowledge is based on the increasing internationalization of indigenous issues in recent years, and the increasing accessibility to indigenous knowledge systems by non-indigenous entities. This increased external access is allied with attendant commercialization of several aspects of indigenous knowledge systems and resources. In turn, the commercialization of these knowledge systems and resources has engendered allegations of 'biopiracy': that is, the unauthorized or uncompensated access to indigenous knowledge and resources. This situation creates tensions between local communities and the states, and sometimes, between developing and developed states. In consequence, therefore, there is the imperative to protect the knowledge systems that have for centuries constituted the means of personal expression, survival and subsistence for indigenous and local communities.
In brief, the crux of this thesis is that indigenous knowledge systems are peculiar in several respects, reflecting the distinct social and cultural practices of diverse local communities. Therefore, a good understanding of these peculiarities is a vital starting point in any effort to protect these knowledge systems. In the main, these peculiarities relate to three major aspects of the nature of indigenous knowledge. The first aspect relates to the holistic nature of indigenous knowledge: this attribute implies that local .communities nurture and exploit indigenous knowledge essentially as 'unified body of knowledge systems,' and do not compartmentalize knowledge into distinct components. The second aspect relates to the cumulative or inter-generational accumulation of knowledge across many generations, and over several centuries. These two attributes lead to the third: the preponderance of group or communal use and ownership of knowledge and resources by local communities.
This thesis affirms that the need to protect indigenous knowledge systems exposes the inadequacies inherent in existing intellectual property right (IPR) mechanisms for this purpose. Furthermore, key existing treaties, including the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992, and the ILO Convention on Tribal Populations 1982, among others, fall short of adequately protecting indigenous rights, knowledge, and interests. These inadequacies stem from the combined effects of the three factors noted above, especially the group nature of indigenous rights and resource holding.
In consequence of the above, to effectively protect the resource rights and interests of indigenous and local communities, this thesis proposes the adoption of an International Convention on the Cultural and Resource Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This Convention is to act as a framework instrument for the sui generis domestic protection of indigenous cultural and resource rights as 'group rights,' to accommodate collective interests of indigenous and local communities, while allowing access to interested parties. In doing this, this thesis deliberately separates indigenous 'cultural and resource rights' from the issue of indigenous self-determination. This is to ensure that the adoption of the Convention by the international community is not entangled in the same web of international politics that has trailed the meaning of 'indigenous self-determination' for decades. In this way, getting control of effective cultural and resource rights would be a positive step for local communities.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: Indigenous peoples (International law), Indigenous peoples, Ethnoscience
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2007 the author - The University is continuing to endeavour to trace the copyright owner(s) and in the meantime this item has been reproduced here in good faith. We would be pleased to hear from the copyright owner(s).

Additional Information:

Thesis (PhD)--University of Tasmania, 2007. Includes bibliographical references. Ch. 1. The nature of indigenous knowledge systems -- Ch. 2. 'Property' and indigenous knowledge systems -- Ch. 3. Accessing biological diversity and indigenous knowledge systems: bioprospecting -- Ch. 4. Indigenous peoples, prior informed consent, and access to indigenous knowledge systems -- Ch. 5. 'Biopiracy' and access to indigenous knowledge systems -- Intellectual property rights and the protection of indigenous knowledge systems -- Ch. 7. Indigenous group rights and the protection of indigenous knowledge systems -- Ch. 8. Conclusions

Date Deposited: 03 Feb 2015 03:08
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2017 00:06
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP