Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Kenosis Creativity Architecture


Downloads per month over past year

Lindstrom, RS (2015) Kenosis Creativity Architecture. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

PDF (Whole thesis)
Whole_Lindstrom...pdf | Download (7MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

| Preview


Theology and philosophy establish that kenosis, or self-emptying, reveals the ontology of creativity. But, until now, architecture – a primal expression of human creativity – has not been correlated with kenosis, nor has either been thought of as informing or taking the measure of the other. This dissertation moves toward rectifying that lack. It opens-up interdisciplinary thinking about kenosis to reveal the subject’s manifold foundations: its locus classicus in Christian scriptures, its antecedents in antiquity, its medieval and modern development, and its emergence in most major faith traditions. Such foundations enable a further opening-up of kenotic thought – for the first time, through architecture. Accordingly, the situations of eight, widely recognised architectural projects are re-examined, this time focusing on their kenotic claims and the kenosis they manifest. Located in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia – where several are affected by the kenotic dimensions of various world religions – these projects include works by Louis Kahn, I.M. Pei, Tadao Ando, Daniel Libeskind, and Peter Eisenman. Though newly revealing, this examination often mirrors the kenosis it seeks – holding the originating questions open, and opening-up still others. In fact, this thinking about kenosis through architecture ultimately turns, and opens-up a unique thinking about architecture through kenosis – extending to architecture’s very being. Kenotic emptiness asks of architecture’s fullness, of the barriers to architecture’s own kenosis. And it asks how such a kenosis might influence an increasingly secularised, globalised, and environmentalised – indeed, aestheticised – world. Questions of kenosis, creativity, and architecture are explored in the interest of elevating humanity’s thinking about the aesthetisation of culture; a critical pursuit, worthy to be critically considered, since such thinking affects virtually everyone and everything.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: kenosis, creativity, architecture, secularization, aesthetization, self-emptying, self-assertion
Copyright Holders: The Author
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2015 the author

Date Deposited: 26 Apr 2016 03:06
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2016 00:52
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page