Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Environmental Reporting Through an Ethical Looking Glass

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Morrison, LJ and Wilmshurst, TD and Shimeld, S (2016) Environmental Reporting Through an Ethical Looking Glass. Journal of Business Ethics. ISSN 0167-4544

[img] Other (PDF)
Ethical Lens ep...docx | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

This paper adopts the lens of environmental ethics to explore whether there is a disparity between the
ethical approaches of a company in comparison to those expressed by stakeholders in relation to environmental issues, specifically those communicated through the corporate environmental report. Discourse analysis is adopted to explore the environmental section of the sustainability reports of the case study company as compared to the responses of a sample of the company’s stakeholders, using the lens of three branches of environmental ethics: utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics. Results indicate that the ethical approaches expressed in the case study company’s environmental reports were grounded in utilitarianism and deontology, in contrast to a virtue ethics approach expressed by external stakeholders. The disparity widened as the relationship between the company and the stakeholder became less direct. This disparity signals a failure to meet one of the primary purposes for preparing sustainability reports: to engage with stakeholders. As such this research contributes to the literature by identifying a disparity in the how this information is communicated compared with how it is perceived by stakeholders. This has important implications for the success of current stakeholder engagement practices.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Environmental ethics, Environmental reporting, Expectations gap, Deep ecology, Deontology, Discourse analysis, Stakeholder engagement, Sustainability, Utilitarianism, Virtue ethics
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 0167-4544
Identification Number - DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3136-4
Copyright Holders: Springer Science +Business Media Dordrecht
Copyright Information:

Full text available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-016-3136-4

Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2016 05:38
Last Modified: 27 Sep 2016 05:38
Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP