Library Open Repository

Comparison of IR content policies in Australia

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Sale, AHJ (2005) Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. Working Paper. Unpublished. (Unpublished)

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
Comparison_of_content_policies_in_Australia.pdf | Download (104kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

[img] Other (MS Word version)
Comparison_of_content_policies_in_Australia.doc | Download (34kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

Seven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.

Item Type: Report (Working Paper)
Keywords: institutional repositories, open access, mandatory policies, repository content, DEST, HERDC time series
Publisher: Unpublished
Date Deposited: 08 Dec 2005
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 03:10
URI: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/id/eprint/230
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Available Versions of this Item

Repository Staff Only (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page