Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Healthy, wealthy and wise : investigating the application of health economics in workplace health promotion : the economic evaluation of Healthy@Work

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Baxter, S (2015) Healthy, wealthy and wise : investigating the application of health economics in workplace health promotion : the economic evaluation of Healthy@Work. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img] PDF (Whole thesis (published material removed))
Baxter_whole_th...pdf | Document not available for request/download
Full text restricted until 4 November 2017.
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

[img] PDF (Whole thesis)
Baxter_whole_th...pdf | Document not available for request/download
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

Workplace health promotion (WHP) describes any initiative carried out in the workplace to support and ultimately improve the health and wellbeing of people at work. Implementation of WHP is often unique to the organisation, and can include individual, social, cultural, environmental and political processes. Funding of WHP may necessitate an economic evaluation. The ideal evaluative method, however, is unclear. This thesis investigated the application of health economics in WHP by considering established guidelines and business needs to conduct an economic evaluation of an organisational approach to WHP in state government, Tasmania, Australia; Healthy@Work (2009-2012).
The first chapter is a review of the global WHP evidence. A quality-based systematic literature review identified currently used components of economic evaluations. It found that methodological quality of economic evaluations was generally low to moderate and that benefits were measured predominately by changes in absenteeism and healthcare costs. The review also provided a robust synthesis of return on investment, accounting for quality along with offering recommendations for improving the state of evidence in WHP.
From insights gained, a resource was then developed on behalf of a research-policy partnership. The second chapter describes the development of a workplace health savings calculator that is currently a national resource to assist employers at a business case level and is available in a WHP toolkit on the Australian federal government website.
Data sourced locally (Healthy@Work) and nationally (Household Income and Labour Dynamics of Australia; HILDA) were used in a further analysis to investigate the validity of health utility in the employee population. It demonstrated construct validity of a measure of health status (SF-6D) derived from health-related quality of life (SF-12v2), and recommended its use in economic evaluations. This finding closes the gap between evaluations in WHP and health economic guidelines.
Collectively these works helped identify measure and value what costs and benefits are involved in WHP. The final chapter applied this knowledge. An economic evaluation of Healthy@Work was conducted. Overall costs and impacts from health status, total lost productive time and healthcare utilisation were presented in a cost consequence analysis. There was no health status change found and inherent challenges for WHP when positioned within a public health paradigm were discussed.
This thesis presents a range of studies that add to the body of knowledge for conducting economic evaluations in workplace health promotion. It discusses economic forms and analytic methods in the pursuit of best fit for WHP.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: Workplace health promotion, Health economics, Economic Evaluation, Complex public health interventions, Return on investment (ROI), SF-6D(SF-12v2XSF-36) health utility, Workplace Health Savings Calculator, Policy-Research partnership
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2015 the Author

Additional Information:

Chapter 2 appears to be the equivalent of a post-print version of an article published as: Baxter, S., Sanderson, K., Venn, A. J., Blizzard, C. L., Palmer, A. J., 2014. The Relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs, American journal of health promotion, 28(6), 347-363.

Chapter 3 has been published as: Baxter, S., Campbell, S., Sanderson, K., Cazaly, C., Venn, A. J., Owen, C., Palmer, A. J., 2015. Development of the workplace health savings calculator: a practical tool to measure economic impact from reduced absenteeism and staff turnover in workplace health promotion, BMC research notes, 8(457), 1-12

Chapter 4 appears to be the equivalent of a post-print version of an article published as: Baxter, S., Sanderson, K., Venn, A. J., Otahal, P., Palmer, A. J., 2015. Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an employed population, Quality of life research, 24(4), 851-870. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0823-4

Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2016 05:14
Last Modified: 30 Aug 2017 22:24
Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP