Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Planning reform in Australia's island-state

Castles, AK and Stratford, E (2014) Planning reform in Australia's island-state. Australian Planner, 51 (2). pp. 170-179. ISSN 0729-3682

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Tasmania’s Resource Management and Planning System chiefly addresses land-use planning and approvals,
environmental management and pollution control, state policies and projects, and the formation of independent
statutory bodies for planning oversight and appeals. Its emergence coincided with a period when sustainable
development/ecological modernisation was central to Australian Government policy, and when neoliberalism
became entrenched across the nation. The Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993, pivotal to the system,
has been the subject of many amendments. Since 2007, some such amendments have provided for regional
planning, streamlined planning schemes, private certification processes and improved information. These
changes have been motivated by commercial, social, economic, political, environmental and ethical considerations,
and their passage has been more complex than originally anticipated. Drawing on planning documentation
and insights from key stakeholders involved in state planning, in this paper we outline the scope of reform. We
find that well-documented refrains play out again, among them the contestability of planning’s objectives and
the values underpinning them; the human and financial resources required to effectively manage the system and
implement change; and the paradox that planning’s shortcomings – and the gains from consequent reform – are
often overstated.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Australian Planner
Publisher: Routledge
Page Range: pp. 170-179
ISSN: 0729-3682
Identification Number - DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2014.890942
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2014 Taylor & Francis

Date Deposited: 22 Nov 2016 23:46
Last Modified: 22 Nov 2016 23:46
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP