Comparison of IR content policies in Australia

Sale, AHJ (2006) Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. First Monday, 11 (4).

This is the latest version of this item.

Preview

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer
104Kb

Official URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_4/sale/

Abstract

Seven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.

Item Type:	Article
Keywords:	institutional repositories, open access, mandatory policies, repository content, DEST, HERDC time series
Fields of Research 2008:	UNSPECIFIED
Subjects:	280000 Information, Computing and Communication Sciences > 280100 Information Systems
SEO 2008:	UNSPECIFIED
SEO:	UNSPECIFIED
Collections:	UNSPECIFIED
ID Code:	264
Deposited By:	UTas Digital Archives Librarian
Deposited On:	22 Feb 2006
Last Modified:	18 Jul 2008 19:40
ePrint Statistics:	View statistics for this ePrint

Available Versions of this Item

Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 08 Dec 2005)
- Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 22 Feb 2006) [Currently Displayed]

Repository Staff Only: item control page