Comparison of IR content policies in Australia
Sale, AHJ (2006) Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. First Monday, 11 (4).
This is the latest version of this item.
|PDF - Requires a PDF viewer|
Official URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_4/sale/
Seven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005.
The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.
|Keywords:||institutional repositories, open access, mandatory policies, repository content, DEST, HERDC time series|
|Deposited By:||utas eprints|
|Deposited On:||22 Feb 2006|
|Last Modified:||18 Jul 2008 19:40|
|ePrint Statistics:||View statistics for this ePrint|
Available Versions of this Item
Repository Staff Only: item control page