Library Open Repository
Comparison of IR content policies in Australia
Sale, AHJ (2006) Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. First Monday, 11 (4).
This is the latest version of this item.
Comparison_of_content_policies_in_Australia.pdf | Download (107kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.
Seven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.
|Keywords:||institutional repositories, open access, mandatory policies, repository content, DEST, HERDC time series|
|Journal or Publication Title:||First Monday|
|Publisher:||University of Illinois at Chicago|
|Date Deposited:||22 Feb 2006|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2014 03:10|
|Item Statistics:||View statistics for this item|
Available Versions of this Item
Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 08 Dec 2005)
- Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 22 Feb 2006) [Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only (login required)
|Item Control Page|