Library Open Repository

Marine introductions in the Shark Bay World Heritage Property, Western Australia: a preliminary assessment

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Wyatt, ASJ and Hewitt, CL and Walker, DI and Ward, TJ (2005) Marine introductions in the Shark Bay World Heritage Property, Western Australia: a preliminary assessment. Diversity and Distributions, 11 (1). pp. 33-44. ISSN 1366-9516

[img] PDF
2005_D&D_Wyatt_et_al.pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

The presence and impacts of non-indigenous species (NIS) in marine areas of high conservation or World Heritage significance have rarely been examined. Case studies worldwide suggest that the potential exists for the introduction of NIS to significantly impact conservation values in regions conserved for the uniqueness and diversity of native assemblages. In this study, a preliminary investigation was conducted to provide information essential for managing marine introductions in the Shark Bay World Heritage Property. A focused fouling plate survey sampled a total of 112 encrusting taxa, of which 10 (11.2%) were classified as introduced and 10 others as cryptogenic. Eight introduced bryozoans: Aetea anguina (Linnaeus, 1758), Bugula neritina (Linnaeus, 1758), Bugula stolonifera Ryland, 1960, Conopeum seurati (Canu, 1928), Savignyella lafontii (Audouin, 1826), Schizoporella errata (Waters, 1878), Watersipora subtorquata (d’Orbigny, 1842) and Zoobotryon verticellatum della Chiaje, 1828; one tunicate, Styela plicata Lesueur, 1823; and an introduced hydroid, Obelia dichotoma (Linnaeus, 1758) were frequent, and in some cases dominant, components of encrusting communities. Of the 20 most frequently occurring species detected in the Bay, four were introduced and of the 20 species with highest average percent cover per plate, six were introduced. At one site, space occupation by NIS averaged 71.6% ± 7.4 of plate live cover. Space occupation by an individual NIS was as high as 62.4% of plate area (mean 7.82% ± 1.8). NIS were detected at sites lacking commercial traffic and ballast water discharge and isolated by distance and physical environment, suggesting that hull fouling of recreational craft may be the most important vector in the region. Seventy-five percent of NIS detected in Shark Bay are established in Australian ports to the south of Shark Bay, while 33% are established to the north, tentatively implicating temperate affinity NIS and the movement of vessels from Australian ports south of Shark Bay as a greater risk to the region.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Biological invasions, fouling community, hull fouling, non-indigenous species (NIS), tropical /temperate affinity
Journal or Publication Title: Diversity and Distributions
Page Range: pp. 33-44
ISSN: 1366-9516
Identification Number - DOI: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00109.x
Additional Information: The definitive published version is available online at: http://interscience.wiley.com
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2008 03:04
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 03:52
URI: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/id/eprint/7817
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Repository Staff Only (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page