Please Note:

The Open Access Repository will be moving to a new authentication system on the 1st of November.

From this date onwards, account holders will be required to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If your current repository username differs from your University username, please email so we can update these details on your behalf.

Due to the change, there will be a short outage of the repository from 9am on the morning of the 1st of November

Open Access Repository

Placemaking, urban design and power relations in a local government context: the case of Glenorchy, Tasmania


Downloads per month over past year

Ancher, K (2007) Placemaking, urban design and power relations in a local government context: the case of Glenorchy, Tasmania. Research Master thesis, University of Tasmania.

PDF (Front matter)
01_Front.pdf | Download (89kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

PDF (Whole thesis)
02WholeAncher.pdf | Download (3MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.


Redefining local government’s role in urban planning to incorporate a number of the
principles of sustainability – participation in local affairs and the enhancement of quality
of life chief among them – is both complex and dynamic, requiring Council staff and
elected representatives to be highly skilled and communities to be highly responsive. In
short, they must engage. This research investigates how place-making may provide a
mechanism for people to work together in multi-disciplinary teams, share power and
decision-making, develop skills and be part of processes to plan, design, construct and
manage place. Place-making is a powerful expression of communities’ capacities to
develop sense of belonging, confidence and worth. Focusing on one local government,
the City of Glenorchy in the island state of Tasmania, Australia, three questions arise in
this research: What is the role of the urban designer in collaborative place-making? What
are the functions of municipal governments in such activities, given their central role in
the management of settlements at the ‘small’ or ‘local’ scale? What might an
understanding of the shifting operations of power provide in addressing these other
questions, given that many urban designers are employed by local governments to ‘serve’
local communities in place? Using qualitative research methods, I investigate how
elected representatives, Council staff and community members living or working in
Glenorchy have addressed such questions. Four methods have been used to enlighten my
research and data collection. The first was an interpretive analysis of a wide range of
secondary literature. The second was the administration of two surveys, one involving
Aldermen, Council staff, City of Glenorchy residents and another administered among
participants and organisers involved in an event known as the 2003 Glenorchy Works
Festival. The third was the use of in-depth interviews held with organisers of the Festival
and included opportunistic conversations with Festival participants. Finally, using autoethnographic
approaches I documented and reflected upon my own position as an urban
designer in a discussion of a number of the place-making projects in which I was
involved. My conclusions from these efforts are that place-making can provide a
mechanism by which community engagement fosters cooperation among people working
together in multi-disciplinary teams, sharing power and decision-making, developing
skills and being part of processes to plan, design, construct and manage place.
Nevertheless, one must always be mindful of power-over and its contingent operations
through such forms of community engagement.

Item Type: Thesis (Research Master)
Additional Information:

Copyright 2007 the Author

Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2008 06:10
Last Modified: 11 Mar 2016 05:53
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page