Library Open Repository
Perils and possibilities: achieving best evidence from focus groups in public health research
Willis, KF and Green, J and Daly, J and Williamson, L and Bandyopadhyay, M (2009) Perils and possibilities: achieving best evidence from focus groups in public health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33 (2). pp. 131-136. ISSN 1326-0200
Willis_etal_200...pdf | Document not available for request/download
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.
Objective: Focus group research is often seen as a cost-effective way of gathering evidence from multiple research participants about the diversity of their views, experiences or beliefs. Our objective is to argue that focus group research only fulfils its potential if analysis of individual views is extended to include analysis of interaction between participants, so that we learn more why people hold these views.
Approach: We outline the literature on focus group research, contrasting the 'quick-and-easy' approach with the demands of studies that are designed, conducted and analysed in a methodologically rigorous way to yield high quality public health evidence.
Conclusion: Well-conducted focus groups contribute good evidence for public health decision making. The challenges of conducting high-quality studies should not be underestimated, and must involve rigorous analysis of both interaction and content.
|Keywords:||focus groups • qualitative • evidence|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health|
|Page Range:||pp. 131-136|
|Identification Number - DOI:||10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00358.x|
The original publication is available at
|Date Deposited:||16 Jun 2009 02:17|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2014 04:00|
|Item Statistics:||View statistics for this item|
Actions (login required)
|Item Control Page|