Library Open Repository
Chase, J (2004) Indicator reliabilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69 (1). pp. 115-137. ISSN 1933-1592
Chase%2C_James_-_Indicator_Reliabilism_-_Philosophy_and_Phenomenological_Research_Vol_LXIX_No._1_July_2004.pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.
In 'Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology'Goldman offers a theory of justification inspired by the exemplar account of concept representation. I discuss the connection and conclude that the analogy does not support the theory offered. I then argue that Goldman's rule consequentialist framework for analysis is vulnerable to a problem of epistemic access, and use this to present an analysis of justification as an indicator concept we use to track how well the evaluated agent is doing with respect to the primary epistemic norm of believing truths and not falsehoods. A theory of justification along these lines is then given, and its prospects of handling the evil demon objection to reliabilism are assessed.
|Journal or Publication Title:||Philosophy and Phenomenological Research|
|Page Range:||pp. 115-137|
|Identification Number - DOI:||10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00386.x|
|Additional Information:||The original publication is available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/|
|Date Deposited:||19 Aug 2009 02:31|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2014 04:04|
|Item Statistics:||View statistics for this item|
Repository Staff Only (login required)
|Item Control Page|