Due to routine maintenance, access to the Library Open Repository will be interrupted on the morning of Friday 12th February.
We apologise for any inconvenience.

Library Open Repository

Is the bean better? A comparison of abdominal and cervical muscle activity using surface EMG

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Bird, ML and Dornauf, S and Cornock, A and Visentin, DC (2009) Is the bean better? A comparison of abdominal and cervical muscle activity using surface EMG. In: 6th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Clinical Anatomists, November 26th & 27th, Melbourne, Australia.

[img]
Preview
PDF
A_comparative_E...pdf | Download (218kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare superficial abdominal and cervical muscle activity while performing a traditional crunch with the same activity performed on a commercial device, The BeanTM. Manufacturers purport that a crunch performed on The BeanTM should produce 55-72% more activity in upper and lower rectus muscles and oblique muscles. METHOD: Thirty Four participants (males 21, females 13) performed 10 repetitions on both apparatus, in a randomly allocated order. Surface electromyography (EMG) measured the muscular activity of the upper and lower sections of the rectus abdominis (RA), the external oblique (EO) and the sternocleidomastoid (S). A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine any significant difference in peak and half peak width for all the above muscles. RESULTS: The BeanTM did not produce significantly higher results in any of the measurements. There was significantly higher peak activity in the upper rectus performing a traditional crunch compared to a crunch performed using The BeanTM (p = 0.005), with no significant difference in the cervical EMG recordings for either peak height (mV) or half peak width (s). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that this apparatus does not produce a significant increase in activity in any of the abdominal muscles, and significantly less in the upper rectus muscle group compared to a traditional abdominal crunch. The amount of work required by the long cervical flexor musculature is not significantly different between the two performances.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)
Date Deposited: 02 Mar 2010 05:51
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 04:09
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Repository Staff Only (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page