UTas ePrintsComparison of IR content policies in AustraliaAHJSaleauthorSeven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.280100 Information Systems2005-12UnpublishedReport

Permissions, Copyright and Authorship Statement
I grant the University of Tasmania permission to copy, store and communicate this work I declare that I either own the copyright in the work or I am submitting this work with permission of the copyright owner or under licence from the copyright owner. I declare that the metadata regarding authorship are true and correct and that it complies with the authorship requirements set down in the Joint NHMRC/AVCC Guidelines on Research and Practice.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.