  <eprint xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>266</eprintid>
    <rev_number>5</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>4</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/02/66</dir>
    <datestamp>2006-03-07</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2008-07-18 09:40:40</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2008-07-16 15:43:29</status_changed>
    <type>monograph</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Sale</family>
          <given>AHJ</given>
        </name>
        <id>Arthur.Sale@utas.edu.au</id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>Generic Risk Analysis - Open Access for your institution</title>
    <ispublished>unpub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>280100</item>
    </subjects>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <monograph_type>technical_report</monograph_type>
    <keywords>Risk analysis, open access, open archives, OAR, policies</keywords>
    <abstract>This is a generic risk analysis for any institution (university, research organization, etc) contemplating the installation of an Open Access Repository. It covers the major risks identified by experienced repository operators. The key risks are 2.1b, 2.3 and 2.8, and actions are recommended to reduce these risks to 'low' (scoring 6 or below out of a possible 25). If these actions are taken, establishing an Open Access Repository is truly a low risk operation.&#13;
&#13;
This analysis does not specifically address benefits of an Open Access Repository, which can be found elsewhere. It is assumed that your institution has made an in-principle decision, at least.&#13;
&#13;
Thanks to all the members of the international community of Open Access who contributed to this document.</abstract>
    <date>2006-03</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <publisher>Unpublished</publisher>
    <institution>University of Tasmania</institution>
    <department>School of Computing</department>
    <thesis_type>UNSPECIFIED</thesis_type>
    <refereed>FALSE</refereed>
    <referencetext>Harnad, S. (2005) OA Impact Advantage = EA + (AA) + (QB) + QA + (CA) + UA. http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/29-guid.html&#13;
  Hennekin, Edwin, and Kurtz, Michael J., unpublished. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/daser-harnad_files/Slide26.jpg   &#13;
  Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T. &amp; Oppenheim, C. (2003) Mandated online RAE CVs linked to University Eprint Archives: Improving the UK Research Assessment Exercise whilst making it cheaper and easier. Ariadne 35 (April 2003). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/&#13;
  Kurtz, Michael J.; Eichhorn, Guenther; Accomazzi, Alberto; Grant, Carolyn; Demleitner, Markus; Henneken, Edwin; Murray, Stephen S. (2005) The Effect of Use and Access on Citations. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 41, Issue 6, p. 1395-1402 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2005IPM....41.1395K&#13;
  Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. (2005) Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 28(4) pp. 39-47.&#13;
  Swan, A and Brown, S (2005).   Open access self-archiving: an author study, pp1-104. Published by the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%20Self%20Archiving-an%20author%20study.pdf or http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/Open%20Access%20II%20(author%20survey%20on%20self%20archiving)%202005.pdf&#13;
  Sale, Prof Arthur (2006) A researcher's viewpoint, in Jacobs, Neil, Eds. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Limited. http://eprints.comp.utas.edu.au:81/archive/00000257/&#13;
  RightsCom study on Disciplinary Differences and Needs. Published by the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Disciplinary%20Differences%20and%20Needs.doc&#13;
  Romeo. http://romeo.eprints.org/stats.php&#13;
  Wellcome Trust (2005).   Wellcome Trust and publishers reach agreement on Open Access. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc%5Fwtx027916.html&#13;
  http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html&#13;
  http://www.arl.org/sparc/pubs/enews/aug01.html#6&#13;
  Unpublished communications from providers of and clients of commercial OAR services.&#13;
  Based on unpublished communications from operators of Australian OARs.&#13;
  http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3189.html&#13;
  I worry about FAQs. Published on EPrints website.  http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/self-faq/#32-worries&#13;
  Research Assessment Exercise. http://www.rae.ac.uk/&#13;
  Research Quality Framework. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/issues_paper.htm</referencetext>
    <documents>
      <document xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>546</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>266</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <license>cc_utas</license>
        <main>Risk_Analysis-v1.0.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>Risk_Analysis-v1.0.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>203331</filesize>
            <url>http://eprints.utas.edu.au/266/1/Risk_Analysis-v1.0.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
