3654 27 archive 236 disk0/00/00/36/54 2008-05-28 12:20:05 2008-12-03 01:25:07 2008-07-16 16:58:56 article show Mitchell.Rolls@utas.edu.au Rolls M Mitchell.Rolls@utas.edu.au pub 200201 420305 420202 420306 public Have emailed the editor.antithesis@gmail.com for permission(SvA 7/5/08) ISSN should be 1030-3839 (confirmed on Ulrichs and Horizon) - on item says 1030-3939 (28/5/08 SvA) received email response - no real answer so have just restricted it: Dear Sandy It appears that the editorial committee has no power of decision making over access to articles published in antiTHESIS as the copyright is owned by the University of Melbourne. In order to get permission to archive an article from the journal you will need to fill in this online permissions request form from the Copyright Office and someone from there will get in touch with you. http://www.unimelb.edu.au/copyright/information/fastfind/externalrequest.html I hope that helps. Kind regards, Vanessa In early 1997 two instances of non-Aboriginal Australians covertly adopting an Aboriginal persona attracted much comment in the press, and on radio and television. It emerged that Wanda Koolmatrie, an Aboriginal woman who had been taken from her mother as a child and had authored the 1995 award-winning autobiography My Own Sweet Time, was in fact Leon Carmen, a forty-seven-year old white male taxi driver from Sydney's North Shore. At the same time it was learnt that the eighty-one-year-old illustrator and artist Elizabeth Durack, who had spent many of her young adult years in close contact with Aboriginal employees on her family's extensive pastoral interests in the Kimberley, was painting and marketing artwork under the assumed identity of Eddie Burrup, a fictitious Aboriginal man. In an attempt to authenticate his existence Durack had even prepared a biography that accompanied the paintings. It included "quotes" in Aboriginal-English, allegedly taken from tapes of Burrup speaking. The interest in these two instances of appropriation, and Aboriginal condemnation of them, was not surprising. Significantly, however, these obvious and readily understood examples of non-material cultural appropriation are but two manifestations of a widespread practice. 1999 published Antithesis 10 117-133 TRUE 1030-3839 http://www.antithesis.unimelb.edu.au/ 4615 5 3654 1 application/pdf en public cc_utas

The_Making_of_Our_Place.pdf

The_Making_of_Our_Place.pdf 428539 http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3654/1/The_Making_of_Our_Place.pdf