  <eprint xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
    <eprintid>375</eprintid>
    <rev_number>5</rev_number>
    <eprint_status>archive</eprint_status>
    <userid>4</userid>
    <dir>disk0/00/00/03/75</dir>
    <datestamp>2006-08-23</datestamp>
    <lastmod>2008-07-18 09:42:50</lastmod>
    <status_changed>2008-07-16 15:45:24</status_changed>
    <type>monograph</type>
    <metadata_visibility>show</metadata_visibility>
    <creators>
      <item>
        <name>
          <family>Sale</family>
          <given>AHJ</given>
        </name>
        <id>Arthur.Sale@utas.edu.au</id>
      </item>
    </creators>
    <title>The acquisition of open access research articles</title>
    <ispublished>unpub</ispublished>
    <subjects>
      <item>280100</item>
    </subjects>
    <full_text_status>public</full_text_status>
    <monograph_type>working_paper</monograph_type>
    <keywords>open access, institutional repositories, research articles, journals, deposit rates, mandatory policies</keywords>
    <abstract>The behavior of researchers when self-archiving in an institutional repository has not been previously analyzed. This paper uses available information for three repositories analyzing when researchers (as authors) deposit their research articles. The three repositories have variants of a mandatory deposit policy.&#13;
&#13;
It is shown that it takes several years for a mandatory policy to be institutionalized and routinized, but that once it has been the deposit of articles takes place in a remarkably short time after publication, or in some cases even before. Authors overwhelmingly deposit well before six months after publication date. The OA mantra of 'deposit now, set open access when feasible' is shown to be not only reasonable, but fitting what researchers actually do.</abstract>
    <date>2006-08</date>
    <date_type>published</date_type>
    <publisher>Unpublished</publisher>
    <institution>University of Tasmania</institution>
    <thesis_type>UNSPECIFIED</thesis_type>
    <refereed>FALSE</refereed>
    <referencetext>Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee, 2006. "Higher Education Research Data Collection Time Series 1992-2004," at http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/publications/stats/HERDC%20TimeSeries%20Data%201992-2004.xls, accessed 5 August 2006. &#13;
Stevan Harnad, 2006. "Generic Rationale for University Open Access Self-Archiving&#13;
Policy," Open Access Archivangelism, March 13, 2006, at http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/71-guid.html, accessed 5 August 2006.&#13;
Queensland University of Technology at http://www.qut.edu.au/, accessed 5 August 2006.&#13;
Queensland University of Technology (2006b). "Policy F/1.3 E-print repository for research output at QUT", at http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/F/F_01_03.html, accessed 5 August 2006.&#13;
Arthur Sale, 2006a. The impact of mandatory policies on ETD acquisition. D-Lib Magazine volume 12 No 4, at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april06/sale/04sale.html, accessed 5 August 2006&#13;
Arthur Sale, 2006b. "Comparison of IR content policies in Australia," First Monday volume 11 No 4 (April), at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_4/sale/, accessed 5 August 2006. &#13;
University of Southampton at http://www.soton.ac.uk/, accessed 5 August 2006.&#13;
University of Tasmania at http://www.utas.edu.au/, accessed 5 August 2006.</referencetext>
    <documents>
      <document xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">
        <docid>703</docid>
        <rev_number>1</rev_number>
        <eprintid>375</eprintid>
        <pos>1</pos>
        <format>application/pdf</format>
        <language>en</language>
        <security>public</security>
        <license>cc_utas</license>
        <main>Acquisition.pdf</main>
        <files>
          <file>
            <filename>Acquisition.pdf</filename>
            <filesize>122463</filesize>
            <url>http://eprints.utas.edu.au/375/1/Acquisition.pdf</url>
          </file>
        </files>
      </document>
    </documents>
  </eprint>
