<didl:DIDL xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS 
			 http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didmodel.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:didl="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS"><didl:Item><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3957/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:title>Intercomparison between FI-CL and ICP-MS for the determination of dissolved iron in Atlantic seawater</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Bowie, AR</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Ussher, SJ</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Landing, WM</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Worsfold, PJ</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject>260402 Chemical Oceanography</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>Results from a 3-laboratory blind intercomparison exercise with two widely used analytical methods for the&#13;
determination of iron in seawater are presented. The two methods used are coprecipitation followed by isotope dilution&#13;
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and chemical reduction to iron(ii) followed by flow injection&#13;
with chemiluminescence detection (FI-CL). The five samples used were collected from the South Atlantic Ocean as part&#13;
of the IRONAGES intercomparison exercise. To avoid any inter-bottle variability, the same sample bottles were sent&#13;
sequentially to three laboratories in England, Australia and the United States over a 12-month period. The results show&#13;
that there is no statistical difference (P =0.05) between the shipboard FI-CL method and the directly traceable, low blank,&#13;
isotope dilution ICP-MS method for the determination of iron in surface South Atlantic seawater. There was also excellent&#13;
agreement between the overall mean of the three laboratories (0.54±0.03 nM) and the consensus value from an earlier&#13;
community-wide separate bottle intercomparison using the same IRONAGES sample water (0.59±0.21 nM).</dc:description>
        <dc:publisher>CSIRO</dc:publisher>
        <dc:date>2007</dc:date>
        <dc:type>Article</dc:type>
        <dc:type>PeerReviewed</dc:type>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <dc:identifier>http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3957/1/3957.pdf</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN06073</dc:relation>
        <dc:identifier>Bowie, AR and Ussher, SJ and Landing, WM and Worsfold, PJ (2007) Intercomparison between FI-CL and ICP-MS for the determination of dissolved iron in Atlantic seawater. Environmental Chemistry, 4 (1). 1-Apr. ISSN 1448-2517</dc:identifier>
        <dc:relation>http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3957/</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Component><didl:Descriptior><didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8"><dii:Identifier xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS
		 	    http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd" xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3957/1/</dii:Identifier></didl:Statement></didl:Descriptior><didl:Resource ref="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/3957/1/3957.pdf"></didl:Resource></didl:Component></didl:Item></didl:DIDL>