<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Indirect electro-osmotic pumping</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">RM</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Guijt</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">J</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Lichtenberg</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIF</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">de Rooij</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">E</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Verpoorte</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">E</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Baltussen</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">GWK</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">van Dedem</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The manipulation of liquids within a microcapillary network&#13;
remains a considerable challenge in the development&#13;
of miniaturized total chemical analysis systems&#13;
(μTAS). Fluid manipulation can be achieved using (micro)&#13;
mechanical pumps connected or integrated into the device, and by&#13;
using an electric field (E) for generation of electro-osmotic flow&#13;
(EOF). For glass microdevices, electro-osmotic pumping (EOP) is&#13;
most attractive, since no moving parts and/or valves are required.&#13;
In its simplest embodiment, EOP in microfluidic devices&#13;
involves imposing an E along the full length of the channel by&#13;
immersing electrodes into open solution reservoirs situated at both&#13;
ends of the channel. Electrolytically generated gases at the electrodes&#13;
drift to the surface of the solution reservoirs and escape into the air.&#13;
In more complex situations, however, EOP in a subsection of a&#13;
microchannel may be required. For sampling, for example, from&#13;
brain tissue in living organisms, the presence of electrodes in the&#13;
‘sample reservoir’ (i.e., the brain), and thus outside the microdevice&#13;
is undesirable, since potentials applied to external electrodes interfere&#13;
with the sampling environment. In these cases, electrodes need&#13;
to be integrated into the microfluidic device. The use of electrodes&#13;
in a microchannel, however, is not trivial. Electrolytic gases get&#13;
caught in the sealed microchannel and hence effectively interrupt&#13;
the electric field, and thus fluid movement. A number of&#13;
approaches to avoid bubble formation during spatially localized&#13;
application of voltages in microfluidic networks have been&#13;
reported. In one example, a 1-mm-thick poly(dimethylsiloxane)&#13;
(PDMS) substrate containing the microchannel was sealed with a&#13;
glass cover plate containing the electrodes.1 Electrolytic gases&#13;
formed at the electrodes dissipated through the highly gas-permeable&#13;
PDMS film into the air.&#13;
An alternative method for application of the electric field is the&#13;
use of a conducting barrier between the electrodes and the channel.&#13;
A Nafion membrane has been presented as an interface&#13;
between an open reservoir containing the electrode and a&#13;
microchannel.2 Electrolytic gases dissipate into the air via the open&#13;
reservoir, while the electrical contact afforded by the membrane&#13;
ensured that an E was applied to the closed microchannel. A similar&#13;
approach involves the use of adjacent side channels, which are&#13;
electrically connected, via porous barriers, but where fluid&#13;
exchange is strongly limited.3,4 Either the porous membrane was&#13;
formed using a thin layer of potassium silicate, in or the contact&#13;
was directly over the glass wall separating adjacent channels.&#13;
The three approaches mentioned above allow the creation of&#13;
field-free zones in addition to regions where the field is applied. In&#13;
the field-free regions, charge-independent fluid transport can be&#13;
controlled by EOP elsewhere in the microfluidic system, an effect&#13;
we term “electro-osmotic indirect pumping” (EOIP) to distinguish&#13;
between EOP in- and outside the electric field.&#13;
In this paper, a glass microdevice for both EOP and EOIP using&#13;
electrically connected side channels is presented. Electrical contact&#13;
between the main and side channels is achieved by electrical breakdown&#13;
of the glass barrier between these channels. Electrical breakdown&#13;
for initiating liquid contact between disconnected channels&#13;
has been demonstrated in PDMS devices.5 To our knowledge, this&#13;
is the first time that electrical breakdown for initiation of electrical&#13;
contact between glass microchannels is presented. Cross injection&#13;
by a combination of EOP and EOIP is demonstrated.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">250000 Chemical Sciences</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">250401 Separation Science</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">250400 Analytical Chemistry</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2002-06-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>