Open Access Repository

A reevaluation of Marcuse's philosophy of technology

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Kidd, M (2013) A reevaluation of Marcuse's philosophy of technology. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Whole thesis)
Whole-Kidd-_the...pdf | Download (1MB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

This thesis provides a reevaluation of Herbert Marcuse's philosophy of technology. It argues that
rather than offering an abstract utopian or dystopian account of technology, Marcuse's philosophy of
technology can be read as a cautionary approach developed by a concrete philosophical utopian.
The strategy of this thesis is to reread Marcuse's key texts in order to challenge the view that his
philosophy of technology is abstractly utopian. Marcuse is no longer a fashionable figure and there
has been little substantive literature devoted to the problem of the utopian character of his
philosophy of technology since the works of Douglas Kellner and Andrew Feenberg. This thesis
seeks to reposition Marcuse as a concrete philosophical utopian. It then reevaluates his philosophy
of technology from this standpoint and suggests that it may have relevance to some contemporary
debates.
Marcuse's writings on technology are the primary focus of this thesis, together with a range of
major secondary sources. My discussion is accordingly narrow, although its implications are
sometimes extensive.
Chapter one introduces the problem to be addressed and locates it in the relevant secondary
literature. It explains the strategy and the structure of the thesis as well as the limits of the enquiry.
Chapter two reevaluates the influence of Marxian theory on Marcuse's philosophy of technology
and shows he appropriated it as a critical-analytical approach to modern society. Chapter three
emphasises how Marcuse's critique of the decline of the 'second dimension' of critical reason gives
a specific cast to his thought whilst drawing out the implications of his distinction between technics
and technology. This chapter also acknowledges the early influence of Marcuse's Heideggerian
formation. Chapter four shows that Marcuse's philosophy of technology may have more relevance
to contemporary debates about the philosophy of technology than might be expected. It does so by
giving a critique of the current emphasis on perpetual economic growth from the perspective of the
kind attributed to Marcuse. Chapter five defends Marcuse's concept of nature from a number of
prominent contemporary criticisms and suggests that, despite its apparent concerns, it remains
relevant to the determination of issues common to philosophers of technology and the environment.
Chapter six defends Marcuse’s philosophy of technology from contemporary ‘instrumental’
accounts, and chapter seven undertakes the same task in relation to autonomous accounts of
technology.The thesis concludes that dismissals of Marcuse’s philosophy of technology as abstractly utopian
and pessimistic are one sided and in some respects precipitate. Moreover, there may be something
still to be learnt from his approach to this area of research. His philosophy of technology is arguably
more valuable than the existing literature suggests because it has concrete philosophical features
that can then be applied to developments since his death. This is not to suggest that Marcuse’s
claims can be made out or that his theorising is free from serious problems, it is to correct the record
in certain limited respects.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Keywords: technology, environment, critical theory, capitalism, Marcuse
Additional Information:

Copyright the Author

Date Deposited: 17 Feb 2014 05:09
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2017 01:06
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP