Please Note:

The Open Access Repository has moved to a new authentication system as of the 1st of November.

Account holders will now be able to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If you have trouble logging in please email us on E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can assist you.

Public users can still access the records in this repository as normal

Open Access Repository

Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Kirkpatrick, JB and Daniels, GD and Zagorski, T (2007) Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79 (3-4). pp. 314-322.

[img] PDF
GardensKDZ.pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

This paper determines the relationships between the dependent variables, presence of trees in front garden and front garden type, and socio-economic, environmental and demographic variables, at the suburb scale in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Garden type, largely following a pre-existing classification, and the presence/absence of trees, were recorded from 50 randomly located front gardens in each of 31 suburbs. The suburbs were classified into four groups on the basis of their spectrum of garden types and the percentage frequency of trees. Group one consisted of coastal suburbs of relatively high socio-economic status. Group 2 consisted of suburbs of moderate socio-economic status. Group 3 consisted of the poorest suburbs. The fourth group was composed of suburbs of high socio-economic status, located close to the centre of the city in hilly terrain. All except the rarest garden type occurred in all four groups of suburbs. Multiple regression and general linear models were used to predict tree presence, and the prevalence of particular garden types at the suburb level. Household income was the best predictor of the percentage frequency of trees in front gardens. The variables that appeared in models for garden types were: the percentage of the population with tertiary education (four instances); percentage of population older than 65 years (4); household income (3); percentage of households renting dwellings (3); altitude (3), rainfall (3); unemployment rate (2); percentage of population born in Australia (2); percentage of medium-sized gardens (2); suburb age (1); percentage of workforce in professional and managerial occupations (1). The 12 garden types that could be modelled responded individualistically to these independent variables.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Garden floristics; Garden structure; Front yard; Suburban; Tree cover; Treelessness
Journal or Publication Title: Landscape and Urban Planning
Page Range: pp. 314-322
Identification Number - DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.006
Additional Information:

The definitive version is available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/

Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2007
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 03:21
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP