Open Access Repository

Health risks associated with sewage effluent reuse : case study of the Riverside Golf Course, Tasmania

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Marrable, Simon D (1996) Health risks associated with sewage effluent reuse : case study of the Riverside Golf Course, Tasmania. Coursework Master thesis, University of Tasmania.

[img] PDF (Whole thesis)
whole_MarrableS...pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

This thesis conducts an international review of research regarding the public health risks
associated with using municipal sewage treated effluent on publicly accessible land and
provides an account of a case study that monitored the prevalence and persistence of faecal
organisms irrigated onto a golf course.
It examines in detail the quantitative risk assessment process developed by risk managers in
public health that is used as a tool to predict the likelihood of exposed groups of people to
pathogens that may exist in the effluent. From the literature review, researchers have identified
new waterborne pathogens that are resistant to conventional forms of disinfection, persist long
enough in the environment to reach a potential human host and require only few in number to
cause an infection. Relevant international and national wastewater reuse guidelines are also
reviewed to highlight methods employed by risk managers to minimise the risks of infection as
a consequence of wastewater reuse.
A comprehensive survey of current and proposed reuse schemes in Australia was also
conducted to help ascertain the growth and the extent of reuse practices in the country. It was
found that over the last 13 years the proportion set aside for intentional reuse of the total
sewage volumes treated has almost doubled from 3.8 to 6.9% and will continue to grow in the
near future. Most of this has been utilised for greenspace or agricultural irrigation where there
will be some degree of public contact with the effluent.
Because of the current growth of reuse schemes and the prevalence of these new pathogens
found in sewage it is prudent to conduct further environmental sampling for these high risk
pathogens so that more informed risk assessments can be estimated.
A case study was conducted to identify persistence of faecal coliforms/Escherichia coli (FC/E.
co/i) pathways and persistence at the Riverside Golf Course, Launceston, Tasmania which uses
chlorinated secondary treated sewage effluent supplied by the West Tamar Council for
irrigation during warm dry weather (October 1995 - April 1996). The effluent is pumped to a
temporary holding pond colonised by water fowl and is then spray-irrigated by pop-up
sprinklers at a rate of approximately 5 mm for the fairways and 29 mm for the greens per
week. Potential routes of transmission of FC/E. coil are discussed and a health risk assessment
is presented.
Three rounds of FC/ E. coil sampling were conducted on the 11-12/10/1995, 8-9/11/1995 and
the 26-27/3/1996. Samples of the sewage treatment plant (STP) effluent and holding pond
water were collected before and during irrigation. At 9 sites on the first five holes (fairways
and greens) samples of the irrigant, creek water, turfgrass, topsoil, golf balls, players' hands
and aerosols were collected before and after irrigation. Irrigant water, turfgrass and topsoil
were sampled in the early morning; golf balls, players hands and aerosols in the morning,
midday and afternoon; and creek samples in the afternoon. Samples were analysed using the
membrane filtration technique with the exception of the aerosols which were collected onto
agar strips using a high volume centrifugal sampler. Various meteorological, and physicochemical
parameters were also monitored.
It was found that the STP effluent entering the holding pond had low counts of FC (R =14
cfu/100 mL, 95% range = 0 - 8 460 cfti/100 mL). The holding pond samples had considerably
higher counts of FC/ E. co/i = 1 840 cfu/100 mL, 95% range = 372 - 9 120 cfu/100 mL)
attributed to the birdlife present. The irrigant samples contained similar high levels of FC/E.
coif (R = 945 cfu/100 mL, 95% range = 187 - 4 760 cfu/100 mL). Meaningful results of the
levels of faecal coliforms on the turfgrass were only available for the third sampling round
(Result Table 2.3). The mean value of FC/ E. coli on turfgrass was 391 cfu/100 mL eq.
(equivalent) after irrigation, which was significantly higher (ti, i6 = -2.027, P = 0.0386) than the
value before irrigation, 75.2 cfu/100 mL eq., indicating that the practice of irrigation
significantly increases the presence of FC/E. coil on the turfgrass. In contrast, the FC/E. coil
counts were undetectable in almost all samples of soil, players' hands, golf balls and aerosols.
in almost all samples of soil, players' hands, golf balls and aerosols. Creek water samples bore
several positive results but tended to be low and due to external contamination. The
meteorological and physico-chemical analysis revealed a strong correlation between soil
moisture and the presence of FC/E. coil in the soil.
Despite the fact that the holding pond faecal bacteria levels exceeded the Tasmanian
Department of Environment and Land Management's (1994) Guidelines for Re-use of Wastewater
in Tasmania mean limit of 750 FC/100 mL from five samples, dieoff was quite rapid indicating
that this practice of wastewater reuse presents minimal health risks to golfers and groundstaff in
terms of indicator FC/E.coli counts. However, it must be borne in mind that actual pathogens
potentially present in effluent are not always adequately indicated by the faecal coliform group,
especially viruses and protozoa which need further research as to their prevalence and
persistence in the irrigated effluent. In addition, further research needs to be undertaken into
the likelihood of the water fowl being a vector opportunity for disease with particular attention
being paid to the increased risks associated with the potential disturbance of the holding pond
sediment.

Item Type: Thesis (Coursework Master)
Keywords: Sewage irrigation, Recycling (Waste, etc.), Sewage sludge, Sewage, Sewage
Copyright Holders: The Author
Copyright Information:

Copyright 1996 the Author - The University is continuing to endeavour to trace the copyright
owner(s) and in the meantime this item has been reproduced here in good faith. We
would be pleased to hear from the copyright owner(s).

Additional Information:

Thesis (M.Env.St.)--University of Tasmania, 1998. Includes bibliographical references

Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2014 02:38
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2017 02:19
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP