Open Access Repository

Dissent, litigation, and investigation: hitting the powerful where it hurts

Salama, O and White, R ORCID: 0000-0002-8800-0093 2017 , 'Dissent, litigation, and investigation: hitting the powerful where it hurts' , Critical Criminology, vol. 25, no. 4 , pp. 523-537 , doi: 10.1007/s10612-017-9370-y.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Environmentally harmful activity undertaken by powerful corporations receive approvals from multiple levels of government, therefore leaving the wellbeing of the environment to those individuals and organisations committed to fighting against such corporate-driven, government-backed projects. This article discusses three avenues for challenging corporate interests, drawing upon issues and events in Australia. Dissent, as illustrated by the Gunns20 case, can provide ordinary individuals with a means to democratically debate existing practices, proposals, and even the law itself. Litigation, as seen in the Carmichael mining case, can be a valuable tool in postponing environmentally disastrous activities by challenging the government’s legitimacy in approving projects that would result in environmental harm. Investigation can expose the manipulation of information presented to the public by both governments and corporations. These three areas of engagement constitute important components for effective environmental activism.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Salama, O and White, R
Keywords: dissent, litigation, investigation, environmental protest, green criminology
Journal or Publication Title: Critical Criminology
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
ISSN: 1205-8629
DOI / ID Number: 10.1007/s10612-017-9370-y
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP