Open Access Repository
Comparison of IR content policies in Australia
Sale, AHJ 2006
, 'Comparison of IR content policies in Australia'
, First Monday, vol. 11, no. 4
.
This is the latest version of this item.
|
PDF
Comparison_of_c...pdf | Download (107kB) Available under University of Tasmania Standard License. | Preview |
Official URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_4/sale/
Abstract
Seven Australian universities (of 38) have established institutional repositories (also known as IRs or eprint archives) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005.
The paper analyses their performance and concludes that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia. Voluntary policies do not, regardless of any author support, consistent with international data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Authors/Creators: | Sale, AHJ |
| Keywords: | institutional repositories, open access, mandatory policies, repository content, DEST, HERDC time series |
| Journal or Publication Title: | First Monday |
| Publisher: | University of Illinois at Chicago |
| Item Statistics: | View statistics for this item |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 08 Dec 2005)
- Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. (deposited 22 Feb 2006) [Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
 |
Item Control Page |