Open Access Repository

Development of a standardized definition for clinically significant bleeding in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial


Downloads per month over past year

Margolis, KL, Mahady, SE, Nelson, MR ORCID: 0000-0001-9941-7161, Ives, DG, Satterfield, S, Britt, C, Ekram, S, Lockery, J, Schwartz, EC, Woods, RL, McNeil, JJ and Wood, EM 2018 , 'Development of a standardized definition for clinically significant bleeding in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial' , Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, vol. 11 , pp. 30-36 , doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.05.015.

126315 Journal ...pdf | Download (487kB)

| Preview


Background: Bleeding is the major risk of aspirin treatment, especially in the elderly. A consensus definition for clinically significant bleeding (CSB) in aspirin primary prevention trials is lacking in the literature.Methods: This paper details the development, modification, application, and quality control of a definition for clinically significant bleeding in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial, a primary prevention trial of aspirin in 19,114 community-dwelling elderly men and women. In ASPREE a confirmed bleeding event needed to meet criteria both for substantiated bleeding and clinical significance. Substantiated bleeding was defined as: 1) observed bleeding, 2) a reasonable report of symptoms of bleeding, 3) medical, nursing or paramedical report, or 4) imaging evidence. Bleeding was defined as clinically significant if it: 1) required transfusion of red blood cells, 2) required admission to the hospital for >24 h, or prolonged a hospitalization, with bleeding as the principal reason, 3) required surgery to stop the bleeding, or 4) resulted in death. Bleeding sites were subclassified as upper gastrointestinal, lower gastrointestinal, intracranial (hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, extradural hematoma, or other), or other sites. Potential events were retrieved from medical records, self-report or notification from treating doctors. Two reviewers adjudicated each event using electronic adjudication software, and discordant cases were reviewed by a third reviewer. Adjudication rules evolved to become more strictly defined as the trial progressed and decision rules were added to assist with frequent scenarios such as post-operative bleeding. Conclusions: This paper provides a detailed methodologic description of the development of a standardized definition for clinically significant bleeding and provides a benchmark for development of a consensus definition for future aspirin primary prevention trials.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Margolis, KL and Mahady, SE and Nelson, MR and Ives, DG and Satterfield, S and Britt, C and Ekram, S and Lockery, J and Schwartz, EC and Woods, RL and McNeil, JJ and Wood, EM
Keywords: aspirin, bleeding, hemorrhage, methods, primary prevention
Journal or Publication Title: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
ISSN: 2451-8654
DOI / ID Number: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.05.015
Copyright Information:

© 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page