University of Tasmania
Browse
Humphries_whole_thesis_ex_pub_mat.pdf (2.74 MB)

Stats, drugs and rock and roll : statistical applications to temporally autocorrelated substance use data

Download (2.74 MB)
thesis
posted on 2023-05-27, 12:04 authored by Melissa Humphries
The use of illicit drugs is an area of interest across a broad range of industries and fields including public policy, law enforcement and physical and mental health. Both the field of measuring drug use in the community and understanding its cognitive impacts are therefore the subject of constant research, development and innovation. This thesis examines statistical applications to temporally autocorrelated data in both the areas of drug use extent and cognitive impact. Specifically, sampling strategies for ascertaining drug use extent from waste water through the utilisation of patterns in weekly drug use is examined. This leads to a practical example of when representative sampling is cost effective enough to be a viable alternative to random sampling. The ability to ascertain cognitive impacts of drug use at the level of the individual is then explored. Analyses of empirical models of cognitive behaviour, that have been traditionally utilised to decompose behaviour, on psychological assessment tools the Iowa Gambling Task and the Balloon Analogue Risk Task are considered. We show that empirical models can lead to an inability to uniquely describe behaviour when considering individuals with possible cognitive impairments (those with extreme behaviours) and discuss the possibility of utilising mechanistic models of the data as a more reliable source of estimating behaviour in the extreme.

History

Publication status

  • Unpublished

Rights statement

Copyright 2017 the author Chapters 4 and 5 appears to be the equivalent of a pre-print version of an article (including supplementary material) published as: Humphries, M. A., Bruno, R., Karpievitch, Y., Wotherspoon, S., 2015. The expectancy valence model of the Iowa gambling task: Can it produce reliable estimates for individuals? Journal of mathematical psychology, 64-65, 17-34

Repository Status

  • Open

Usage metrics

    Thesis collection

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC