Open Access Repository

MRI-derived myocardial strain measures in normal subjects

Vo, HQ, Marwick, TH ORCID: 0000-0001-9065-0899 and Negishi, K ORCID: 0000-0002-9086-2565 2018 , 'MRI-derived myocardial strain measures in normal subjects' , JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 11, no. 2 , pp. 196-205 , doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.025.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the normal ranges of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based feature tracking (FT) and to identify sources of variations. Similar analyses were also performed for strain encoding, displacement encoding with stimulated echoes, and myocardial tagging.Background: MRI-FT is a novel technique for quantification of myocardial deformation using MRI cine images. However, the reported 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the 2 largest studies have no overlaps.Methods: Four databases (EMBASE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for MRI strains of the left (LV) and right (RV) ventricles. The key terms for MRI-FT were "tissue tracking," "feature tracking," "cardiac magnetic resonance," "cardiac MRI," "CMR," and "strain." A random effects model was used to pool LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), and RVGLS. Meta-regressions were used to identify the sources of variations.Results: 659 healthy subjects were included from 18 papers for MRI-FT. Pooled mean of LVGLS was -20.1% (95% CI: -20.9% to -19.3%), LVGCS -23% (95% CI: -24.3% to -21.7%), LVGRS 34.1% (95% CI: 28.5% to 39.7%), and RVGLS -21.8% (95% CI: -23.3% to -20.2%). Although there were no publication biases except for LVGCS, significant heterogeneities were found. Meta-regression showed that variation of LVGCS was associated with field strength (β = 3.2; p = 0.041). Variations of LVGLS, LVGRS, and RVGLS were not associated with any of age, sex, software, field strength, sequence, LV ejection fraction, or LV size. LVGCS seems the most robust in MRI-FT. Among the MRI-derived strain techniques, the normal ranges were mostly concordant in LVGLS and LVGCS but varied substantially in LVGRS and RVGLS.Conclusions: The pooled means of 4 MRI-derived myocardial strain methods in normal subjects are demonstrated. Differences in field strength were attributed to variations of LVGCS.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Vo, HQ and Marwick, TH and Negishi, K
Keywords: DENSE, SENC, feature tracking, healthy, magnetic resonance, meta-analysis, normal range, strain, tagging
Journal or Publication Title: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
ISSN: 1936-878X
DOI / ID Number: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.025
Copyright Information:

© 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP