Open Access Repository
Singular memory or institutional memories? Toward a dynamic approach

Full text not available from this repository.
Abstract
The ability of the civil service to act as a reservoir of institutionalmemory is central to the pragmatic task of governing.But there is a growing body of scholarship that suggests thebureaucracy is failing at this core task. In this article, we distinguishbetween two different ways of thinking aboutinstitutional memory: one “static” and one “dynamic.” In theformer, memory is singular and held in document form,especially by files and procedures. In the latter, memoriesreside with people and are thus dispersed across the array ofactors that make up the differentiated polity. Drawing onfour policy examples from three countries, we argue that amore dynamic understanding of the way institutions rememberis both empirically salient and normatively desirable. Weconclude that the current conceptualization of institutionalmemory needs to be recalibrated to fit the types of policylearning practices required by modern collaborativegovernance.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: | Corbett, J and Grube, DC and Lovell, H and Scott, Rodney |
Keywords: | institutional memory, governance |
Journal or Publication Title: | Governance |
Publisher: | Blackwell Publishers |
ISSN: | 0952-1895 |
DOI / ID Number: | 10.1111/gove.12340 |
Related URLs: | |
Item Statistics: | View statistics for this item |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Item Control Page |