Open Access Repository

Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Cinner, JE, Maire, E, Huchery, C, Aaron MacNeil, M, Graham, NAJ, Mora, C, McClanahan, TR, Barnes, ML, Kittinger, JN, Hicks, CC, D'Agata, S, Hoey, AS, Gurney, GG, Feary, DA, Williams, ID, Kulbicki, M, Vigliola, L, Wantiez, L, Edgar, GJ ORCID: 0000-0003-0833-9001, Stuart-Smith, RD ORCID: 0000-0002-8874-0083, Sandin, SA, Green, A, Hardt, MJ, Beger, M, Friedlander, AM, Wilson, SK, Brokovich, E, Brooks, AJ, Cruz-Motta, JJ, Booth, DJ, Chabanet, P, Gough, C, Tupper, M, Ferse, SCA, Rashid Sumaila, U, Pardede, S and Mouillot, D 2018 , 'Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains' , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 27 , E6116-E6125 , doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708001115.

[img]
Preview
PDF
127234 final.pdf | Download (2MB)

| Preview

Abstract

Coral reefs provide ecosystem goods and services for millions of people in the tropics, but reef conditions are declining worldwide. Effective solutions to the crisis facing coral reefs depend in part on understanding the context under which different types of conservation benefits can be maximized. Our global analysis of nearly 1,800 tropical reefs reveals how the intensity of human impacts in the surrounding seascape, measured as a function of human population size and accessibility to reefs (“gravity”), diminishes the effectiveness of marine reserves at sustaining reef fish biomass and the presence of top predators, even where compliance with reserve rules is high. Critically, fish biomass in high-compliance marine reserves located where human impacts were intensive tended to be less than a quarter that of reserves where human impacts were low. Similarly, the probability of encountering top predators on reefs with high human impacts was close to zero, even in high-compliance marine reserves. However, we find that the relative difference between openly fished sites and reserves (what we refer to as conservation gains) are highest for fish biomass (excluding predators) where human impacts are moderate and for top predators where human impacts are low. Our results illustrate critical ecological trade-offs in meeting key conservation objectives: reserves placed where there are moderate-to-high human impacts can provide substantial conservation gains for fish biomass, yet they are unlikely to support key ecosystem functions like higher-order predation, which is more prevalent in reserve locations with low human impacts.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Cinner, JE and Maire, E and Huchery, C and Aaron MacNeil, M and Graham, NAJ and Mora, C and McClanahan, TR and Barnes, ML and Kittinger, JN and Hicks, CC and D'Agata, S and Hoey, AS and Gurney, GG and Feary, DA and Williams, ID and Kulbicki, M and Vigliola, L and Wantiez, L and Edgar, GJ and Stuart-Smith, RD and Sandin, SA and Green, A and Hardt, MJ and Beger, M and Friedlander, AM and Wilson, SK and Brokovich, E and Brooks, AJ and Cruz-Motta, JJ and Booth, DJ and Chabanet, P and Gough, C and Tupper, M and Ferse, SCA and Rashid Sumaila, U and Pardede, S and Mouillot, D
Keywords: Reef Life Survey, MPA, reef fish, climate change, citizen science
Journal or Publication Title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publisher: Natl Acad Sciences
ISSN: 0027-8424
DOI / ID Number: 10.1073/pnas.1708001115
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2018 The AuthorsLicensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP