Open Access Repository
Cohesion and Complexity: The State, Community and Communities

Full text not available from this repository.
Abstract
As discussed in the previous chapter, understandings of ‘community’vary. Usually academic discussions on community highlight the contestednature of defining the concept. Commentators often then proceedwith a description of community in terms of three aspects: place, interestand identity. However, the contested nature of community has beenquestioned. To illustrate, Taksa (2000) argues that there is a commonalityin debates concerning the loss of community in that many arguethat ‘community’s recovery’ should be based on unity and harmony. Intaking a more critical view about community, the argument is that thisview obscures the differences and divisions that often mark communitiesand so perpetuates social inequalities.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: | Fairbrother, P and Mees, B and Phillips, R and Tyler, M |
Keywords: | wildfire, communication, preparedness, community |
Publisher: | Routledge |
Copyright Information: | Copyright 2019 Taylor & Francis |
Item Statistics: | View statistics for this item |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Item Control Page |