Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Disasters are highly complex with often extreme consequences and are often exacerbated by decision errors. Human behaviour in this domain offers a fertile ground for studying decision-making and identifying opportunities for improvement. This research sought to improve the quality of decision-making by developing an aide memoire for managing cognitive biases in emergency management. Based on the appropriate literature, 58 of Australia’s leading marine spill disaster response experts identified and ranked the most important cognitive biases in a group setting. The results were translated into language relevant to emergency management practitioners and reframed into a series of questions. The identification of nine cognitive biases in the aide memoire can first be used to assess the available information, intelligence and decisions, and then used to determine the meaning of the information, intelligence and decisions. The paper discusses the applicability of the aide memoire to decision errors identified in recent man-made and natural disasters. Finally, the article addresses a criticism that research findings are often not useful to industry by suggesting how the aide memoire can be used in practice.

Item Type:	Article
Authors/Creators:	Brooks, B and Curnin, S and Owen, C and Bearman, C
Keywords:	emergency management decision-making bias
Journal or Publication Title:	Cognition, Technology & Work
Publisher:	Springer UK
ISSN:	1435-5558
DOI / ID Number:	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00564-5
Copyright Information:	Copyright 2019 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
Related URLs:	UTAS Profile: Brooks, B Google Scholar: Curnin, S UTAS Profile: Curnin, S UTAS Profile: Owen, C
Item Statistics:	View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page