Open Access Repository

Preferred, small-scale foraging areas of two Southern Ocean fur seal species are not determined by habitat characteristics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Wege, M, Nico de Bruyn, PJ, Hindell, MA ORCID: 0000-0002-7823-7185, Lea, M-A ORCID: 0000-0001-8318-9299 and Bester, MN 2019 , 'Preferred, small-scale foraging areas of two Southern Ocean fur seal species are not determined by habitat characteristics' , BMC Ecology, vol. 19 , pp. 1-14 , doi: 10.1186/s12898-019-0252-x.

[img]
Preview
PDF
135124 - Prefer...pdf | Download (2MB)

| Preview

Abstract

BackgroundTo understand and predict the distribution of foragers, it is crucial to identify the factors that affect individual movement decisions at different scales. Individuals are expected to adjust their foraging movements to the hierarchical spatial distribution of resources. At a small local scale, spatial segregation in foraging habitat happens among individuals of closely situated colonies. If foraging segregation is due to differences in distribution of resources, we would expect segregated foraging areas to have divergent habitat characteristics.ResultsWe investigated how environmental characteristics of preferred foraging areas differ between two closely situated Subantarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) colonies and a single Antarctic fur seal (A. gazella) colony that forage in different pelagic areas even though they are located well within each other’s foraging range. We further investigated the influence of the seasonal cycle on those environmental factors. This study used tracking data from 121 adult female Subantarctic and Antarctic fur seals, collected during summer and winter (2009–2015), from three different colonies. Boosted Regression Tree species distribution models were used to determine key environmental variables associated with areas of fur seal restricted search behaviour. There were no differences in the relative influence of key environmental variables between colonies and seasons. The variables with the most influence for each colony and season were latitude, longitude and magnitude of sea-currents. The influence of latitude and longitude is a by-product of the species’ distinct foraging areas, despite the close proximity (ConclusionsThe results indicated that small scale spatial segregation of foraging habitats is not driven by bottom-up processes. It is therefore important to also consider other potential drivers, e.g. competition, information transfer, and memory, to understand animal foraging decisions and movements.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Wege, M and Nico de Bruyn, PJ and Hindell, MA and Lea, M-A and Bester, MN
Keywords: Arctocephalus, boosted regression tree, foraging behaviour, foraging segregation, machine learning, Marion Island, niche, sympatry
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Ecology
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1472-6785
DOI / ID Number: 10.1186/s12898-019-0252-x
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2019 The Author(s)Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP