Open Access Repository

What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Satel, J ORCID: 0000-0002-5903-4104, Wilson, NR and Klein, RM 2019 , 'What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return' , Vision, vol. 3, no. 4 , pp. 1-13 , doi: 10.3390/vision3040058.

[img]
Preview
PDF
138202 - What n...pdf | Download (421kB)

| Preview

Abstract

An inhibitory aftermath of orienting, inhibition of return (IOR), has intrigued scholars since its discovery about 40 years ago. Since then, the phenomenon has been subjected to a wide range of neuroscientific methods and the results of these are reviewed in this paper. These include direct manipulations of brain structures (which occur naturally in brain damage and disease or experimentally as in TMS and lesion studies) and measurements of brain activity (in humans using EEG and fMRI and in animals using single unit recording). A variety of less direct methods (e.g., computational modeling, developmental studies, etc.) have also been used. The findings from this wide range of methods support the critical role of subcortical and cortical oculomotor pathways in the generation and nature of IOR.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Satel, J and Wilson, NR and Klein, RM
Keywords: attention
Journal or Publication Title: Vision
Publisher: MDPIAG
ISSN: 2411-5150
DOI / ID Number: 10.3390/vision3040058
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2020 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP