Preview

PDF (Proof Version) Proof.pdf | Download (385kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To examine if, when, and how select allied health professional standards currently articulate the Health LEADS Australia themes. Methods: Eighteen allied health professional standards were searched to locate references to leadership. Data were extracted and inductively, deductively and thematically analysed as a meta-synthesis. Frequencies were counted, with sub-analysis by professional area, classification level, competency type, and Blooms (1) level. Results: There were 953 direct and indirect leadership statements. Only 2 leadership definitions were located: pharmacists and dentists. The principal theme Leadership only appeared as 18 (2%) of the total data set that made direct references to leadership, which were mostly vague and unclear. The remaining indirect references to leadership are reported as four overarching themes: Self leadership (289,31%); Leadership with and of others (263, 29%); Improvement and change leadership (223, 24%) and Health reform leadership (139, 18%). Conclusions: Health leadership is not easily recognisable in the examined allied health practice standards. With some refinement they could play a critical role in preparing future allied health graduates to support ongoing health system reform needed to improve public health.

Item Type:	Article
Authors/Creators:	Dalton, L and Butler-Henderson, K and Newstead, T and Quinn, W
Keywords:	education and training, governance, health policy, health services management, workforce
Journal or Publication Title:	Australian Health Review
Publisher:	C S I R O Publishing
ISSN:	0156-5788
Copyright Information:	Copyright 2020 CSIRO
Related URLs:	Google Scholar: Dalton, L UTAS Profile: Dalton, L Google Scholar: Butler-Henderson, K UTAS Profile: Butler-Henderson, K UTAS Profile: Quinn, W
Item Statistics:	View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page