Open Access Repository

Comparing legal and lay assessments of relevant sentencing factors for sex offences in Australia


Downloads per month over past year

Warner, K, Bartels, L, Gelb, K, Davis, J and Spiranovic, C ORCID: 0000-0002-5270-8719 2021 , 'Comparing legal and lay assessments of relevant sentencing factors for sex offences in Australia' , Criminal Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1 , pp. 57-74 .

143535 - Compar...pdf | Download (393kB)

| Preview


There is an expanding body of research measuring public perceptions of the criminal justice system's responses to offenders in general and sex offenders in particular. However, less is known about public attitudes to the factors that the law classifies as aggravating, mitigating or merely neutral. This article presents key findings from the National Jury Sentencing Study, which sought to address this gap in knowledge in the case of sex offences using two groups: 343 jurors who had returned a guilty verdict; and 149 members of the public called for jury service who were not selected for a trial. The study shows that, in general, the public's intuitive views of sentencing factors are well-aligned with judicial sentencing practice – a finding that contradicts the stereotypical view of the public as particularly punitive towards sex offenders. Some differences in views on factors such as good character and absence of remorse did appear and potential responses to this divergence are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:Warner, K and Bartels, L and Gelb, K and Davis, J and Spiranovic, C
Keywords: sentencing factors, sex offences, Australia, public attitudes, jurors, judicial sentencing practice
Journal or Publication Title: Criminal Law Journal
Publisher: Thomson Reuters
ISSN: 0314-1160
Copyright Information:

Copyright 2021 Criminal Law Journal

Related URLs:
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page