Open Access Repository
Rational choice or strain? A criminological examination of contract cheating

Full text not available from this repository.
Abstract
Contract cheating is a significant problem, both within and outsidethe academy. Responses have largely focused on punitiveconsequences for tertiary students, and in 2019 the AustralianFederal Government proposed legislation that would formallycriminalise contract cheating both for the buyer and the seller.Although contract cheating has the hallmarks of white-collarcrime, criminological examination of this form (and arguably allforms) of academic misconduct has been minimal. Utilising thefindings of Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P.,Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019. Contract cheating: Asurvey of Australian university students. Studies in HigherEducation, 44(11), 1837–1856), where over 14,000 Australiantertiary students were surveyed, we examine contract cheatingthrough a criminological lens and discuss whether rational choicetheory (RCT) or general strain theory (GST) can contribute tounderstanding of its incidence and whether these theories offer away to respond to or prevent this behaviour in the future. Ourfindings suggest that neither theory offers a complete solutionand it is, in fact, a blend of RCT and GST that can help explainstudent contract cheating—what we term ‘strained rationality’.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: | Nagy, V and Groves, A |
Keywords: | contract cheating, academic misconduct, criminology, rational choice, theory, general strain theory |
Journal or Publication Title: | Current Issues in Criminal Justice |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 1034-5329 |
DOI / ID Number: | 10.1080/10345329.2021.1874603 |
Copyright Information: | © 2021 Sydney Institute of Criminology |
Item Statistics: | View statistics for this item |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Item Control Page |