Open Access Repository

Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety?

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Sanderson, Kristy and Tilse, E and Nicholson, J and Oldenburg, B and Graves, N (2007) Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety? Journal of Affective Disorders, 101 (1-3). pp. 65-74. ISSN 0165-0327

[img] PDF
Sanderson_J_Aff...pdf | Request a copy
Full text restricted

Abstract

Background: Lost productivity from attending work when unwell, or “presenteeism”, is a largely hidden cost of mental disorders in
the workplace. Sensitive measures are needed for clinical and policy applications, however there is no consensus on the optimal
self-report measure to use. This paper examines the sensitivity of four alternative measures of presenteeism to depression and
anxiety in an Australian employed cohort.
Methods: A prospective single-group study in ten call centres examined the association of presenteeism (presenteeism days,
inefficiency days, Work Limitations Questionnaire, Stanford Presenteeism Scale) with Patient Health Questionnaire depression and
anxiety syndromes.
Results: At baseline, all presenteeism measures were sensitive to differences between those with (N=69) and without (N=363)
depression/anxiety. Only the Work Limitations Questionnaire consistently showed worse productivity as depression severity
increased, and sensitivity to remission and onset of depression/anxiety over the 6-month follow-up (N=231). There was some
evidence of individual depressive symptoms having a differential association with different types of job demands.
Limitations: The study findings may not generalise to other occupational settings with different job demands. We were unable to
compare responders with non-responders at baseline due to anonymity.
Conclusions: In this community sample the Work Limitations Questionnaire offered additional sensitivity to depression severity,
change over time, and individual symptoms. The comprehensive assessment of work performance offers significant advantages in
demonstrating both the individual and economic burden of common mental disorders, and the potential gains from early
intervention and treatment.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Affective Disorders
Page Range: pp. 65-74
ISSN: 0165-0327
Identification Number - DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.024
Additional Information:

The definitive version is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com

Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2008 22:59
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 03:47
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP