Please Note:

The Open Access Repository has moved to a new authentication system as of the 1st of November.

Account holders will now be able to login using their University of Tasmania credentials.
If you have trouble logging in please email us on E.Prints@utas.edu.au so we can assist you.

Public users can still access the records in this repository as normal

Open Access Repository

Testing for causation in tort law

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Coady, DA (2002) Testing for causation in tort law. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27. pp. 83-95. ISSN 1440-4982

[img]
Preview
PDF
coady.pdf | Download (381kB)
Available under University of Tasmania Standard License.

Abstract

The traditional, intuitively appealing, test for causation in tort law, known as 'the but-for test' has been subjected to what are widely believed to be devastating criticisms by Tony Honoré, and Richard Wright, amongst
others. I argue that the but-for test can withstand these criticisms. Contrary to what is now widely believed, there is no inconsistency between the but for test and ordinary language, commonsense, or sound legal principle.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy
Page Range: pp. 83-95
ISSN: 1440-4982
Additional Information:

© 2002 the Australilan Journal of Legal Philosophy and the Author

Date Deposited: 01 Sep 2009 02:06
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2014 04:04
Item Statistics: View statistics for this item

Actions (login required)

Item Control Page Item Control Page
TOP